top of page
Logo.jpg

Classic Riders Club of Goulburn

Logo.jpg

Downsizing to Something Lighter

  • braddles30
  • Mar 12
  • 4 min read

After the recent Worn Out Wander tour I got to thinking about why motorcyclists I come across are often talking about downsizing, but first let me provide some perspective.


I own a 2006 Goldwing, so about as big a bike as you can throw a leg over, now consider the numbers, with my wife and I, 25kg of luggage and a full tank of fuel this beast tips the scale at over 620 kgs.  Ponder that for a moment and consider the challenge of just pulling up quickly at a stop light without letting the whole show fall on it’s side, especially considering I’m not exactly vertically endowed. It’s a struggle, but fortunately all that disappears as soon as you are on the move, the Wing is supremely comfortable, torquey and simply eats up the long distance miles, for it’s intended purpose it’s superb, but as a general purpose machine the weight is a challenge.



But, I’m lucky, I own several bikes and have the option of some lightweight machines which in truth get far more use, so fair to say I’m very aware of the benefit of a much lighter machine.


The Wing is kind of a victim of it’s own success, the original model, the GL1000 was in its day considered a heavyweight bit of gear but in truth it weighed a puny 245kg or thereabouts, the Goldwing probably more than any other bike piled on the pounds as it aged and matured.  Though in all fairness the newer models are supposed to be around 25kg or so lighter than mine.


Here’s the thing most bike categories have for years been getting heavier and bigger in all dimensions.  A 60’s Triumph twin was only around 180kg and not much bigger than a modern 250/300cc machine and you might be surprised to learn that the first Honda 750 hit the scales at about 213kg and it was considered to be a large super bike!


Road bikes have grown like topsy ever since, they have also got much taller in the saddle but riders are still pretty much the same size and level of strength, so it’s probably no surprise that riders, who are now generally much older than in the 60’s are complaining about the size and weight of modern machines.


So where does this leave us?


Motorcyclists aren’t just “downsizing” for the sake of it—there’s a clear structural shift in the market worldwide toward lighter, more usable bikes. It’s being driven by a mix of rider demographics, economics, technology, and how bikes are actually used today.


1. Real-world usability matters more than outright performance


Modern riding—especially in places like Australia and Europe, leans heavily toward commuting, short trips, and weekend rides rather than long-distance touring. For these purposes lighter bikes are easier to manoeuvre in traffic and tight roads and they require less physical effort at low speed or when parking. Think about this, my Goldwing has a reverse gear, and by God it needs it!

  

Riders can recover mistakes far more easily on, lighter machines which improves confidence, which is especially relevant in urban environments where agility generally beats top speed.


Reducing machine weight improves almost every aspect of riding you get faster acceleration, shorter braking distances and quicker directional changes and cornering stability.


In real-world riding, lighter weight often matters more than outright horsepower.


It’s worth mentioning that the median age of riders is now over 50 in many markets. Talking to many of my older riding friends they will often bring up the same arguments in support of lighter/smaller machine, they go something like this…


I want to be able to get my legs over the bike, I’m not as flexible as I used to be.


I’m worried with a bigger bike I won’t be able to pick it up if it falls over or I drop it moving it around.


I won’t ever get to use the power of a bigger more powerful bike, I need to keep my license.


I can’t move around on a bike the way I used to be able to, I need the bike to be forgiving.


The running costs on larger bikes are a bit steep for my finances.


I just don’t want to ride at high speeds anymore, I don’t have the same reflexes I used to have.


I’d rather ride on slower back roads, flying down the expressway doesn’t interest me anymore.


Now Turning to those running costs


Sub 500cc machines are typically, more fuel efficient, cheaper to insure  and register, cheaper to maintain, less hard on tyres and have a much lower new purchase price.


With rising living costs it makes senses riders are prioritising affordability and practicality over prestige, especially if riding for them is actually about the journey and not the bragging rights.


Technology has closed the gap


Modern lightweight /mid weight bikes no longer feel “cheap” or underpowered, they now have better chassis design and weight distribution, much improved suspension and electronics and power-to-weight ratios that probably equal 70’s super bikes.


As a result, a 300–500cc bike today can outperform many if not most older larger bikes in many real-world scenarios.


Most popular capacities Worldwide


The fastest-growing segments are:

200cc – 400cc → strongest growth globally

300cc – 500cc → sweet spot for performance vs usability

500cc – 700cc → modern “middleweight” category


Looking at weight it seems the current sweet spot is on the 160 to 200kg range and it’s probably no coincidence that for example the svelte Yamaha MT 07 is the biggest selling model in OZ, as it falls in at around 185kg! With a relatively low entry price.


There are still riders who will actually need a larger bike, usually because they need

comfort for long-distance touring, wind stability at highway speeds, capacity for luggage/passengers


Hence large touring and cruiser bikes still exist—but it’s a shrinking niche and market.


Anyhow, it is all food for thought, and speaking of which, what are your thoughts on downsizing.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page